1.-The pictures are extremely classy, even though they can make anyone nervous, ha ha ha, how do you achieve this?
When we started we aimed at changing the World of nude photography. The World of photography was mainly divided into Hard Core photography, Playboy style photography, with very elaborate girls, heavy makeup, and lots of silicone, and finally stylish nude photography. No one seemed to care about natural beauty, but the World was eager, and ready for it. In an age of plastic surgery, and silicone, people naturally react. It’s our firm belief that fake women are the byproduct of an industry in concert with the media, rather than a real need. There’re more men out there that prefer a natural breast, than a fake one, but the media did a good job at shattering women’s confidence. That was our first inspiration, because beauty is natural, and it always will be. I recall a gorgeous movie called “Brazil”. That is a fictional World we’re heading to.

2. - Met-Art is synonymous of perfection in different ways, sometimes there are others who try to copy it, ending in a lifeless picture, Met-Art pics are alive! Again tell us a little bit of that magic?
MetArt was the 1st site to use magazine covers to promote itself. It was a huge success. Soon after other sites started popping up with the same concept, and soon enough, the niche we made so famous was being cloned by hundreds of site that aspired to replicate natural nudes. The main reason why no one managed to really do so is that you still cannot copy style, and vision. The clones not only do not grasp the true philosophy behind MetArt, but on top of that just cannot get the same photographers, or most of the models. The copycats usually get the rejected photographers. If you were an artist, you would logically knock on MetArt door first, because it’s so much better, and so much more famous that any other site. There’re also instances of photographers that were literally created by MetArt, and “Betrayed” us, but unfortunately their success was always short lived, or in other instances their photography is so clinical, and cold that they do not achieve the same success. Other “Desperados” go as far as trying to copy the –art extension! Another milestone that MetArt achieved was to publish entire sets, not just a few handpicked images. The reason was not a coincidence. The photographer needs to maintain a certain level of quality throughout the set, and that’s hard. It’s easy to shoot 500 images, and then choose 5. Most photographers, including celebrated ones would fail at this. On top of that, people can be interested in a detail in an image that an editor would not choose. We empowered the consumer by letting him choose, and left our arrogance in the closet. Surely enough, 5 minutes later every MetArt copy, and more was doing the same. We don’t think that to this day the even know why they offer their customers entire sets, they just copied us. It’s the difference between a poster, and the real thing…We have texture, we have concepts, and ideas, we’re not flat, and reflect light on a cold piece of paper, we absorb that light, like a canvas.